What is Regenerative Farming?

Previously confined to the margins of the conversation about agriculture, ‘regenerative farming’ is now being spoken about at almost every turn. Land management approaches are being re-evaluated worldwide in response to climate events, flooding and drought, the continued decline in biodiversity, and the alarming loss of nutrient-rich topsoil. Accordingly, ‘resilience’ and ‘regeneration’ are becoming synonymous with transition, as the world looks for long-term, meaningful solutions.

But what exactly do we mean by the term regenerative farming? Who are its advocates? Here, we explore some of these questions, as well as the potential of regenerative methods to improve the ecological and financial resilience of those who manage the land.

Defining Regenerative Farming 

There are some widely accepted principles about what regenerative methods are trying to achieve; shared ecological outcomes which seek to improve the resilience of agricultural systems.

Gabe Brown’s book From Dirt to Soil: One family’s Journey into Regenerative Agriculture is a good place to start when learning about the regenerative movement. In his work, he outlines 5 core principles for farming regeneratively, which are:

  1. Limit disturbance of the soil and its structure
  2. Provide the soil with ‘armour’ (cover) to protect against wind erosion and runoff whilst providing habitat for key organisms 
  3. Maintain diversity of plant and animal species 
  4. Sustain living roots in the soil for as long as possible throughout the year
  5. Integrate animals to promote nutrient cycling 
“5 Principles of Regenerative Agriculture”. Credit: Groundswell

“5 Principles of Regenerative Agriculture”. Credit: Groundswell

However, precisely defining ‘regenerative’ farming is challenging. Many organisations and practitioners, ranging from small-scale agro-ecological farms to multinational corporations, now claim to farm ‘regeneratively’. As a result, much like the term ‘sustainability’, it risks losing its value amongst a chorus of conflicting definitions. 

To be regenerative can mean different things to different people, for example, low-input monocropping using cover crops will improve soil structure and health, yet differs from a mixed agroecological farm. Both could reasonably claim to be ‘regenerative’.

Clearly, there is some common ground among practitioners. A recent academic paper reviewed definitions from scientific literature and practitioner’s websites, and found the most common aims were similar to those above; to improve soil health, sequester carbon, increase biodiversity, improve water resources and enhance the social or economic well-being of communities.

Regenerative Farming Certifications

As both practitioner and consumer appetite for regenerative methods grows, the challenge of certifying emerges with it. It poses the question – can you certify a process and outlook, rather than a fixed set of methods? A few companies have emerged with their own labels – the Soil Association highlight that organic farming is regenerative, and therefore their accreditation also falls under this category. Pasture For Life, meanwhile, is newer and exists to certify its products as 100% grass-fed for meat, milk and dairy. What both organisations have in common is an emphasis on the environmental regeneration that comes alongside farming. Regenerative ‘certifications’ might never be able to align unless policy dictates a specific, well-established definition. However, their emergence and increasing popularity represent a clear paradigm shift in the way farming and consumption is being articulated.


Agroecology is a term that often emerges in the regenerative conversation. But what’s the difference? To some, they are essentially two sides of the same coin – agroecology celebrates regenerative methods and vice versa. However, its advocates tend to emphasise more of a social aspect; it represents a holistic and integrated approach to agriculture and food systems recognising the interrelation of plants, animals, humans, and the environment. Diversity is also at its core – of crops, people and livestock. Where regenerative methods can focus on improving soil structure in isolation, agroecology calls for considering how we can optimise the relationships between people and the environment that underpin these farming practices, creating a more resilient environment for all.

“That’s Agroecology”. Credit Soil Association 

“That’s Agroecology”. Credit Soil Association 

Groundswell – The Regen Ag festival

Whilst it may remain slightly imprecise in terms of methods and definitions, regenerative farming continues to grow in popularity. Groundswell Festival, the annual festival celebrating and exploring regenerative methods, was the largest it’s ever been last year. From a small gathering a few years ago, to a national agricultural event, conversations about regeneration are increasing far and fast. As policy shifts towards rewarding environmental goods; increased carbon sequestration, habitat enhancement and soil health – regenerative approaches can potentially be well rewarded not only by higher consumer prices but also by emerging markets seeking to invest in ‘natural capital’.

Alongside movements like groundswell, agri-environment schemes like Countryside Stewardship, Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) and other parts of ELMs are moving to provide better financial support for regenerative farming. As farming evolves from the ground-up and policy down to meet it, one thing is clear – regenerative farming is here to stay.


Growing up on a regenerative small holding, the relationship between food systems and the natural world has long been an interest of mine. Focusing on land-use tensions and geo-politics at Oxford, and now an MSc in Sustainable Development with Exeter, my interests lie in how we can leverage policy and natural capital principles to encourage not only regenerative land management and food systems alongside investment in nature recovery, but ultimately how we can ensure social equity and systems resilience. I’m drawn to the social elements of nature recovery and climate change adaptation, in particular the intersection of geopolitics, biodiversity economics and justice.
Share the Post

Read more

Thought Leadership

26 Mar 2024

Tristan O'Leary

Uncertain Times: European Farming Protests Reflect Anxieties and Uncertainty on Environmental Policy 

The past few months have been rife with farming protests - from France to the Netherlands, Westminster to Wales. Tensions between farmers and European governments are running high; over trade deals, market volatility, policy clarity and the environmental transition. ...

Read more

13 Mar 2024

Tristan O'Leary

Countryside Stewardship Scheme: Where are we now, and how does that affect my application?

The evolution of Countryside Stewardship as a policy has seen significant changes, reflecting the UK government's commitment to promoting environmentally sustainable farming practices while adapting to feedback and evolving priorities....

Read more

Case Studies

21 Feb 2024

Tristan O'Leary

Wetlands, Natural Flood Management and Farming for the Future: A Case Study with FarmED

This month brings World Wetlands Day, especially poignant this year as awareness around the biodiversity crisis increases whilst flooding events worsen in severity and consistency. I sat down with Ian Wilkinson, director at FarmED, to discuss wetlands and natural flood...

Read more